<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Am I A Reductionist?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chuckscoggins.com/blog/2010/05/26/am-i-a-reductionist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chuckscoggins.com/blog/2010/05/26/am-i-a-reductionist/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 02:59:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Scoggins</title>
		<link>http://chuckscoggins.com/blog/2010/05/26/am-i-a-reductionist/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Scoggins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 01:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckscoggins.com/blog/?p=119#comment-127</guid>
		<description>Well stated, John!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well stated, John!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://chuckscoggins.com/blog/2010/05/26/am-i-a-reductionist/comment-page-1/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 20:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckscoggins.com/blog/?p=119#comment-125</guid>
		<description>Sounds good in theory.  I&#039;ve always liked the idea of being a reductionist, but it&#039;s extremely difficult in application.  In regards to the church, with the body of Christ all under one roof, it&#039;s hard to have one specific focus with so many different ideas.  

I was always impressed by the church in Georgia that has put out several full feature films including Fireproof and others...I think that it&#039;s cool that their local body has all signed on to one vision of what their church will do.  

I do think that the body is rendered ineffective when chasing after many thoughts/ideas, but the key must be a visionary whom can focus the church in a manner in which people can grow spiritually and still follow a vision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds good in theory.  I&#8217;ve always liked the idea of being a reductionist, but it&#8217;s extremely difficult in application.  In regards to the church, with the body of Christ all under one roof, it&#8217;s hard to have one specific focus with so many different ideas.  </p>
<p>I was always impressed by the church in Georgia that has put out several full feature films including Fireproof and others&#8230;I think that it&#8217;s cool that their local body has all signed on to one vision of what their church will do.  </p>
<p>I do think that the body is rendered ineffective when chasing after many thoughts/ideas, but the key must be a visionary whom can focus the church in a manner in which people can grow spiritually and still follow a vision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

